A blog listing random publications written by myself and others for clients around the world. This Blog is updated on a daily basis with new and innovative articles published online.
Friday, November 29, 2013
Why Women Should Train with Weight
Monday, November 18, 2013
Adding quality muscle to your body weight
If your objective is to put on muscle then it is recommended that you go back to the old school bodybuilding workout. It seems that the good old bodybuilding workout of the 1970’s has been lost in the complicated shuffle that has been going on since we started the muscle and fitness boom that started in the 80’s.
It was the good old days when the answer to gaining muscle was the simple basics like doing compound movements like squats, dead-lift and bench-press, but things seemed to have got lost along the way. With all the research and all the new high powered developments we have got into with the new High Intensity Interval Training called HIIT everything seems to have changed.The old school method of putting on good quality muscle by doing squats and drinking a gallon of milk a day no longer seems to be followed. Today everything has changed about the way we train our bodies. Research shows us that we need to do short 45 minute workouts with a high intensity if we want to get the ‘after-burn’ effect and burn fat.
50 years ago the bodybuilders were able to put on a hold an enormous amount of muscle without taking steroids. They were able to do that by following the basics like squats, dead-lift and bench-press. Doing a high intensity squat workout has proven to help increase the amount of muscle you can carry because you increase your core strength.Doing squats with reps as high as 20 or even 25 reps with a heavy weight is the secret to building muscle and getting stronger which seems to have fallen away. There is no doubt that the good old squats and milk workout would still work the wonders that it has always worked but very few people follow this type of training and dietary advice.
I challenge you to take on the training with reps when doing squats to see if you can increase the amount of muscle you carry. Research shows us that when you are able to squat reps as high as 20 in a set with a heavy weight you will put on a lot of muscle because you will get stronger.When you can squat with 150% of your body-weight for 20 reps without stopping you will carry a lot more muscle on your body than the average person in your gym there is no doubt about it. It is tough training to get to that point but it has proven to work.
Monday, November 4, 2013
How to Gain One Pound of Muscle a Week
What is the ‘After-burn effect?’
How deep should you squat?
Thursday, August 1, 2013
This will help to solve your energy crisis
If you are seeing that the cost of energy that you are using every day to stay alive is going up more than you can afford then you need to start looking for effective alternatives and there is plenty of options out there.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Maintain health and gain wealth
"People of lower socioeconomic status consistently appear to have much worse health outcomes," as James P Smith, a senior economist at the RAND Corporation in the US, bluntly described the link in a 2005 paper. "No matter which measures of socioeconomic status are used or how health is measured, the evidence that this association is large and pervasive across time and space is abundant." Indeed, statistics from the US, where the most comprehensive data on health and wealth are available, show that people in the top quartile of incomes report being significantly healthier throughout their working lives than those in the second, third and fourth quartiles. Once people start to get past age 80, however, wealth appears to be a weaker determinant of health. The percentage of people reporting very good or excellent health converges at roughly 35 per cent.
The moral, according to the research - as long as you are working and making money, staying healthy preserves your ability to do so. And by extending your moneymaking lifespan, you are in effect ensuring you have a better chance at getting wealthy. You also improve your odds of avoiding disability, which could seriously hamper your ability to grow wealthier over time. And by not spending lots of money on maintaining and treating an unhealthy lifestyle, you free up capital you could save, invest or do anything you like with.
The numbers back up that notion. Drawing on a large survey of US households, researchers have estimated that the full cost of a major health shock - something unexpected but possibly related to smoking, obesity or poor general health - soars to an average of Dh135,000 after eight years, taking into account both lost income and treatment costs not covered by insurance. Moreover, people who had a big health scare actually saw their average household incomes reduced below where they were before. For many families in the survey, it took years of persistence to recover financially.
What's especially daunting about the link between ill health and lack of wealth is that it can devolve into a vicious cycle of lower income and declining health. Research shows that there is not only a casual link between bad health and less wealth, but also between lower levels of wealth and declining health. As Peter Muennig, a professor at Columbia University, put it in a paper published last year, "low income can damage health, and sickness can lead to the loss of income".
That is ample reason both to avoid getting sick and to make sure you keep up on savings and investing (and maybe drop a few pounds). In the end, though, the wealth-health cycle may not be quite so simple. While researchers have worked out that wealth and health are correlated and that health causes wealth and vice versa, it remains unclear where the strongest chain of causality lies - whether it is more crucial to be healthy in order to gain and preserve wealth or whether it is better to be wealthy in order to maintain health.
The wealth side of the equation may play a more important role than once thought, according to recent research. Mr Muennig, for example, concluded in his paper last year, "Health Selection vs. Causation in the Income Gradient", that "income predominantly produces health", and not the other way around. That conclusion, if proven correct by further data-gathering and research, means that performing well at work and getting raises while sticking to a strict budget may be more than the key to putting your kids through college or living well in retirement. It may also be crucial to staying in good health, living longer and enjoying life more.
Follow us: @TheNationalUAE on Twitter | thenational.ae on Facebook
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Secret Group Pumping Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars Into Anti-Wind, Anti-Solar, & Anti-Climate Action Campaigns
What am I talking about? Today, I’m referring to Donors Trust and Donors Capital Fund, which have spent hundreds of millions of dollars on anti–climate action, anti-solar energy, and anti–wind energy campaigns.
“Promising anonymity to their conservative billionaire patrons, the trusts between them channelled nearly $120m to contrarian thinktanks and activists, wrecking the chances of getting Congress to act on climate change,” Suzanne Goldenberg of the Guardian writes.
“Now the Guardian can reveal the latest project of the secretive funding network: a campaign to stop state governments moving towards renewable energy.”
With congressional climate action essentially stalled for the next couple years at least (due to highly ideological and anti-science Republicans in the House and Senate), the billionaires (some of which most definitely are in the coal and oil industries) have turned to what seems to be their next biggest threat — wind and solar power growth through other means (e.g. Renewable Energy Standards, feed-in tariffs, solar and wind tax incentives, etc.).
Wind and solar are highly supported by the general public (and, thus, by many of their local, state, and federal representatives), so attacking them outright is a bit difficult. But, as they say, “where there’s a will, there’s a way.”
Complete misinformation regarding wind and solar is pushed over and over and over again by thinktanks, media agencies, and politicians linked to (or even bought by) rich coal and oil industry executives. And it’s rather effective.
Now, we are simply getting a better glimpse of who’s funding much of this (well, the secret agency that is doing so… not the individuals).
Here’s a bit more from Ms. Goldenberg about the recent anti-wind and anti-solar push:
The campaign against wind and solar power was led by a relatively new entity, the Franklin Centre for Government and Public Integrity. The Franklin Centre did not exist before 2009, but it has quickly become a protege of Donors Trust.
The Franklin Centre, headquarters barely one-tenth of a mile away from the nondescript Alexandria, Virginia town home of its funders, received $6.3m from the two funds in 2011. It was the second largest disbursement to any entity by the Donors that year, according to tax records.
The largesse to the Franklin Centre signals a shift in priorities for the conservative billionaires who are funding the anti-climate cause towards local and state-level organising.
The backers of the anti-climate cause have eased off in their support of DC-centric thinktanks, said Whitney Ball, the chief executive and president of Donors Trust. “They are not as prominent any more.”
Instead, it appears the donors are banking on an aggressive anti-climate media strategy, led by the Franklin Centre, to push back against climate action.
In 2011, Donors Trust helped the Franklin Centre expand its media operations to Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio and Virginia, the Centre for Public Integrity reported in an investigation on conservative funding networks.